Monday, August 10, 2015

DHRUV STAMBH NOT QUTUB MINAR :

 HOW ALREADY MADE BUILDINGS GETS CAPTURED AND NAMED AFTER MIGHTY KINGS HERE

Qutub Minar in Delhi is actually Dhruv Sthambh with arabic scripts and motifs reto-installed by Qutb-ud-din Aibak between 1191 – 1210 AD, followed by his successors Iltutmish, Alauddin etc till 1315 AD. The Qutb Complex was originally a site with 27 Hindu and Jain Temples. These temples were destroyed by the foreign invaders. These temples existed much before Ghori was even born.

By demolishing the majestic temples, they served another very important purpose. To ensure stronghold, it was important that the backbone of religion prevailing in conquered land is crushed. Destroying temples meant that the new Invaders had no respect for the religion being practiced by locals. They were in such hurry of completing the job, that they were not able to deface the statues properly. Even today, the remains of temples can be seen within the Qutub Complex. The remaining 26 temples surrounding the Qutubminar/Dhruv Sthambh were destroyed almost completely.

WHAT HISTORICAL WRITTEN LITERATURE SAYS?

Following are the other prominent travel historians of related period
• Ibn Asir (with his work Kamil-ut-Tawarikh aka Tarikh-i-Kamil)
• Ata Malik Juwaini aka Alau-ud-din Juwaini (with his work Tarikh-i- Jahan-Kusha)
• Maulana Nuruddin Muhammed ‘Ufi, who lived in Delhi during Altamash’s period (with his work Jami-ul-Hikayat wa Liwami-ul-Riwayat)
• Minhaj-i-Siraj (with his work Tabkat-i-Nasiri)

The above authors make no mention of Minar, logical reason could be either the minar construction was never done at that time OR the Minar would have been already there which looks common to the people like many other existing structure. If it was one of the biggest construction of era, these people, who were living in Delhi and writing particularly on Qutb-ud-Din Aibak must have mentioned about it.

STRUCTURAL SIGNIFICANCE TO TRACE WHO MIGHT HAVE MADE IT?
 
<<Proof 1>> If we look at Qutub Minar from top angle, it shows a lotus of 24 petals.Lotus is definitely not a foreign invaders symbol, but it is ancient vedic symbol which people in India use frequently in temples and performing prayers.
 
<<Proof 2>> There is a township adjoining the Kutub Minar is known as Mehrauli. That is a Sanskrit word Mihira-awali. It signifies the town- ship where the well known astronomer Varaha-Mihira of Vikramaditya’s court lived along with his helpers, mathematicians and technicians. They used the so-called Qutub tower as an observation post for astronomical study. Around the tower were pavilions dedicated to the 27 constellations of the Vedic Astrology (see 2nd pic).
 
<<Proof 3>> Even the dome of this tower from inside view has a multiple lotuses embeded within each other (similar to Sri Yantra, see 3rd pic).
 
<<Proof 4>> Qutubuddin has left us an inscription that he destroyed these pavilions. But he has not said that he raised any tower. Indian archaeologists have recorded wrong history without studying the destroyed and defaced Indian gods statues and motifs in and around this tower  

<<Proof 5>> Stones dislodged from the so-called Qutub Minar have Hindu images on one side with Arabic lettering on the other. Those stones have now been moved to the Museum. They clearly show that invaders used to remove the stone- dressing of Hindu buildings, turn the stones inside out to hide the image facial and inscribe Arabic lettering on the new frontage.
 
<<Proof 6>> Bits of Sanskrit inscriptions can still be deciphered in the premises on numerous pillars and walls. Numerous images still adorn the cornices though disfigured.

Foreign Invaders never use flower symbols on their constructions, but this tower has multiple lotus symbols in stone !!

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, HOW INDIAN ARCHEOLOGIST MADE SUCH BLUNDERS WITH MANY MORE HUNDREDSOF MONUMENTS??
The Indian history and historical archeology suffered the biggest trauma when India, after independence, accepted the historical surveys and conclusions of an Anglo historian named Cunningham as true and perfect history even after the arguments of many historians that the historical reports of Cunningham were full of flaws because of his foreign origin and lack of broad cultural experience. The Qutub complex also suffered from the same mistake.

WHAT HISTORIANS SAYS?
The famous late historian P.N Oak says in his work that the Qutubminar along with the destroyed 27 temples was also an Indian observatory existed centuries before Qutubddin Aibak. Many other historians have also approved the minaret as an observatory site earlier known as Vishnu Stambh alias Dhruv Stambh in ancient India, the name Vishnudhwaja is also engraved on iron pillar situated in the premises. The writing in Bramhi script on iron pillar talks about glorious Hindu King Chandragupt admitted as Chandragupt Vikramaditya who erected the pillar. P.N Oak says that both Iron pillar and Qutubminar were made by Chandragupt Vikramadity and are contemporary or even existed before there rule.The current Mehrauli, area where the Qutub minar is situated, basically derived from the Sanskrit word Mihiraavali’ literally means the hill of/for Mihir. Mihir alias Varah Mihir was the famous mathematician and scientist in Vikramaditya’s court who wrote the famous book ‘Vrihatsamhitayam’. Thus the Qutubminar/Dhruv Sthambh complex was an observatory and qutubminar/Dhruv Sthambh was its part which initially had seven stories representing the seven days of the week or seven main planets, two upper stories were dismantled by Firozshah Tuglaq and ruins were later used to try to erect a similar minaret which stands nearby.

Professor M.S Bhatnagar of Ghaziabad hired a helicopter in 1964 and inspected the Qutubminar/Dhruv Sthambh from just top and found that side erections of the minaret basically form a 24 leaves lotus shape, a well-known spiritual and architectural sign repeatedly referred in Hindu karmkaand, yoga and architect. These 24 leaves are basically 24 horas or hours of a day. It’s noteworthy that the word hour is a product of the word hora which was adopted in Greek from Sanskrit as same. Twelve complete dials of the structure on the ground refers to twelve zodiacs of the astrological science. The 27 temples were actually sites for 27 Nakshatra or constellations. Many scholars assume these temples as Jain temples because of the Jain statues found there but in fact these were the centers of astronomical research instead worshiping sites because the architect had both Hindu and Jain statues in Vedic style. Jain Aagams have also been famous for a lot of knowledge. About 1960, a great black Vishnu statue was recovered from the Qutubminar/Dhruv Sthambh which currently under custody of ASI, the whole information was kept secret.

No comments:

Post a Comment